Current:Home > reviewsColorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause -OceanicInvest
Colorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause
View
Date:2025-04-18 01:44:11
DENVER (AP) — The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday declared former President Donald Trump ineligible for the White House under the U.S. Constitution’s insurrection clause and removed him from the state’s presidential primary ballot, setting up a likely showdown in the nation’s highest court to decide whether the front-runner for the GOP nomination can remain in the race.
The decision from a court whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.
Colorado’s highest court overturned a ruling from a district court judge who found that Trump incited an insurrection for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, but said he could not be barred from the ballot because it was unclear that the provision was intended to cover the presidency.
The court stayed its decision until Jan. 4, or until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the case.
“We do not reach these conclusions lightly,” wrote the court’s majority. “We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us. We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.”
Trump’s attorneys had promised to appeal any disqualification immediately to the nation’s highest court, which has the final say about constitutional matters. His campaign said it was working on a response to the ruling.
Trump lost Colorado by 13 percentage points in 2020 and doesn’t need the state to win next year’s presidential election. But the danger for the former president is that more courts and election officials will follow Colorado’s lead and exclude Trump from must-win states.
Colorado officials say the issue must be settled by Jan. 5, the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.
Dozens of lawsuits have been filed nationally to disqualify Trump under Section 3, which was designed to keep former Confederates from returning to government after the Civil War. It bars from office anyone who swore an oath to “support” the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against it, and has been used only a handful of times since the decade after the Civil War.
The Colorado case is the first where the plaintiffs succeeded. After a weeklong hearing in November, District Judge Sarah B. Wallace found that Trump indeed had “engaged in insurrection” by inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, and her ruling that kept him on the ballot was a fairly technical one.
Trump’s attorneys convinced Wallace that, because the language in Section 3 refers to “officers of the United States” who take an oath to “support” the Constitution, it must not apply to the president, who is not included as an “officer of the United States” elsewhere in the document and whose oath is to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution.
The provision also says offices covered include senator, representative, electors of the president and vice president, and all others “under the United States,” but doesn’t name the presidency.
The state’s highest court didn’t agree, siding with attorneys for six Colorado Republican and unaffiliated voters who argued that it was nonsensical to imagine the framers of the amendment, fearful of former Confederates returning to power, would bar them from low-level offices but not the highest one in the land.
“You’d be saying a rebel who took up arms against the government couldn’t be a county sheriff, but could be the president,” attorney Jason Murray said in arguments before the court in early December.
veryGood! (33)
Related
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- ‘Venom 3’ tops box office again, while Tom Hanks film struggles
- Here’s what to watch as Election Day approaches in the U.S.
- Election Throws Uncertainty Onto Biden’s Signature Climate Law
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- 9 Years After the Paris Agreement, the UN Confronts the World’s Failure to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Federal Regulators Waited 7 Months to Investigate a Deadly Home Explosion Above a Gassy Coal Mine. Residents Want Action
- Netflix's Moments feature makes it easier to share scenes without screen recording
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Getting Out the Native Vote Counters a Long History of Keeping Tribal Members from the Ballot Box
Ranking
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Pete Davidson Shows Off Tattoo Removal Transformation During Saturday Night Live Appearance
- Arkansas chief justice election won’t change conservative tilt of court, but will make history
- Puka Nacua ejected: Rams star WR throws punch vs. Seahawks leading to ejection
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- NASA astronauts to redock SpaceX Dragon at International Space Station: How to watch
- Proof Jelly Roll and Bunnie XO Will Be There for Each Other ‘Til the Wheels Fall Off
- Do high ticket prices for games affect sports fan behavior? Experts weigh in.
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword, Save the Day (Freestyle)
Harris won’t say how she voted on California measure that would reverse criminal justice reforms
Shootings kill 2 and wound 7 during Halloween celebrations in Orlando
In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
Millions may lose health insurance if expanded premium tax credit expires next year
Cecily Strong is expecting her first child: 'Very happily pregnant from IVF at 40'
Competing Visions for U.S. Auto Industry Clash in Presidential Election, With the EV Future Pressing at the Border