Current:Home > NewsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -OceanicInvest
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
SafeX Pro Exchange View
Date:2025-04-09 16:33:51
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Kentucky prosecutor accused of trading favors for meth and sex pleads guilty to federal charge
- Generation Alpha is here, how will they affect the world? | The Excerpt
- Man Behind Viral Dress Debate Pleads Guilty to Attacking His Wife
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- Rope team rappels down into a rock quarry to rescue a mutt named Rippy
- This week on Sunday Morning (May 12)
- Target says it's cutting back on Pride merchandise at some stores after backlash
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Generation Alpha is here, how will they affect the world? | The Excerpt
Ranking
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- New grad? In these cities, the social scene and job market are hot
- Here’s what to know about conservatorships and how Brian Wilson’s case evolved
- Rope team rappels down into a rock quarry to rescue a mutt named Rippy
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- North Carolina Catholic school had right to fire gay teacher who announced wedding online, court rules
- This Overnight Balm Works Miracles Any Time My Skin Is Irritated From Rosacea, Eczema, Allergies, or Acne
- Indiana-Atlanta highlights: How Caitlin Clark, Fever performed in second preseason game
Recommendation
'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
Police disperse protesters at several campuses, use tear gas in Tucson
KTLA Reporter Sam Rubin Dead at 64
Oprah Winfrey Shares Biggest Regret After Being Steadfast Participant in Diet Culture
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Arrive in Nigeria for 3-Day Tour
Transgender activists flood Utah tip line with hoax reports to block bathroom law enforcement
Gun thefts from cars in the US have tripled over the past decade, new report finds