Current:Home > StocksPublishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -OceanicInvest
Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
View
Date:2025-04-17 01:12:25
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and unfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at [email protected]
veryGood! (87921)
Related
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Fantasy football rankings: Sleeper picks for every position in 2024
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, ...er...er
- Arkansas county agrees to $3 million settlement over detainee’s 2021 death in jail
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Elite prosecutor misused position by offering Justice Department card in DUI stop, watchdog finds
- Man wanted on murder and armed robbery charges is in standoff with police at Chicago restaurant
- Maine mass shooting report says Army, law enforcement missed chances to avert attacks
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Sorry, Chicago. Yelp ranks top 100 pizza spots in Midwest and the Windy City might get mad
Ranking
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Army soldier in custody after pregnant wife Mischa Johnson goes missing in Hawaii
- Jesse Winker’s pinch-hit homer in 9th gives Mets 4-3 win over Orioles
- NFL Comeback Player of the Year: Aaron Rodgers leads Joe Burrow in 2024 odds
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Ashanti Shares Message on Her Postpartum Body After Welcoming Baby With Nelly
- Several factors may be behind feelings of hypochondria. Here are the most common ones.
- Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck Break Up, File for Divorce After 2 Years of Marriage
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Meg Ryan Looks Glowing at Rare Red Carpet Appearance in Bosnia
Lithium drilling project temporarily blocked on sacred tribal lands in Arizona
Iowa abortion providers dismiss legal challenge against state’s strict law now that it’s in effect
Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
Grapefruit-sized hail? Climate change could bring giant ice stones
‘The fever is breaking': DeSantis-backed school board candidates fall short in Florida
Who Are Madonna's 6 Kids: A Guide to the Singer's Big Family