Current:Home > reviewsJudge rejects Trump's motion to dismiss 2020 federal election interference case -OceanicInvest
Judge rejects Trump's motion to dismiss 2020 federal election interference case
View
Date:2025-04-13 22:44:39
Washington — A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Friday rejected an attempt by former President Donald Trump to dismiss the special counsel's 2020 election interference case against him on the grounds of presidential immunity.
Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled Trump cannot be shielded from criminal prosecution after leaving office for alleged conduct during his time in office. The former president argued special counsel Jack Smith's four charges should be dropped on the basis that presidents cannot be charged with a crime.
"Whatever immunities a sitting President may enjoy, the United States has only one Chief Executive at a time, and that position does not confer a lifelong 'get-out-of-jail-free' pass," Chutkan wrote late Friday in a lengthy opinion, spurning Trump's arguments on historical, constitutional and legal grounds.
Trump is charged with four federal counts in this case, including conspiracy to defraud the U.S., stemming from his alleged effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges.
Last month, the former president's attorneys filed a motion asking Chutkan to toss the case, contending Trump has presidential immunity from prosecution for actions performed within the "outer perimeter" of his official responsibility.
"Breaking 234 years of precedent, the incumbent administration has charged President Trump for acts that lie not just within the 'outer perimeter,' but at the heart of his official responsibilities as President," they wrote. "In doing so, the prosecution does not, and cannot, argue that President Trump's efforts to ensure election integrity, and to advocate for the same, were outside the scope of his duties."
Trump's attorneys stipulated the former president "emphatically denies the truth of any allegations in the indictment" and argued the conduct for which he was charged — largely that he allegedly worked to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and conspired to defraud the U.S. with six unnamed co-conspirators — was performed not just as a candidate for the presidency, but also as the sitting president. That distinction, they said, shields him from prosecution.
Like Trump's attorneys, Chutkan also referred to American history, but countered that the Founding Fathers, including George Washington — who she noted first established the transfer of power — valued the principle of peaceful succession, "a tradition that stood unbroken until January 6, 2021," she wrote.
"[Trump] may be subject to federal investigation, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and punishment for any criminal acts undertaken while in office,' Chutkan wrote Friday.
The judge argued the Constitution does not completely immunize presidents from criminal prosecution tied to their office to avoid creating "the unaccountable, almost omnipotent rulers of other nations" that existed at the time of the nation's founding.
"A former President's exposure to federal criminal liability is essential to fulfilling our constitutional promise of equal justice under the law," the judge said.
Despite their client no longer holding public office, Trump's legal team argued that the unique and sensitive nature of the job requires that the president not be distracted by threats of legal action, a component of the legal theory that shields sitting presidents, not former presidents, from criminal charges. Such immunity, the defense team contended, encompasses all of the conduct that is alleged in the special counsel's indictment.
But the judge's opinion rejected that argument, instead contending that the threat of potential prosecution after leaving office might force a sitting president to grapple with certain situations "before deciding to act with criminal intent."
"That is a benefit, not a defect," she wrote
A Trump campaign spokesperson said in a statement responding to Friday's ruling that the former president "will keep fighting for America and Americans, including by challenging these wrongful decisions in higher courts," indicating an appeal of Chutkan's decision is likely.
"Radical Democrats, under the direction of Crooked Joe Biden, continue to try and destroy bedrock constitutional principles and set dangerous precedents that would cripple future presidential administrations and our country as a whole, in their desperate effort to interfere in the 2024 Presidential Election," the spokesperson said.
Trump's defense team also asked Chutkan to dismiss the case on the basis that the former president's conduct was First Amendment-protected speech, that he was denied due process, and that his impeachment in the House and acquittal in the Senate prevented further judicial proceedings under the principle of double jeopardy. The judge denied those requests, too.
"Defendant is not being prosecuted for publicly contesting the results of the election; he is being prosecuted for knowingly making false statements in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy and for obstruction of election certification proceedings," she wrote Friday.
For his part, the special counsel opposed the former president's attempts to get the case dismissed as meritless.
"Any speech that the defendant used to carry out the conspiracy, fraud, and obstruction crimes charged in the indictment is categorically excluded from the protections of the First Amendment," prosecutors wrote last month.
Friday's ruling came just hours after an appeals court in Washington, D.C. ruled Trump is not currently entitled to broad immunity from civil lawsuits that seek to hold him accountable for actions surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol.
The unanimous opinion from the three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit allows lawsuits against Trump to move forward.
"The sole issue before us is whether President Trump has demonstrated an entitlement to official-act immunity for his actions leading up to and on January 6 as alleged in the complaints," Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan wrote. "We answer no, at least at this stage of the proceedings."
Trump could also appeal that decision.
- In:
- Donald Trump
- Election
- Jack Smith
Robert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Luis Diaz sends a message for his kidnapped father after scoring for Liverpool
- Taylor Swift's Night Out With Selena Gomez, Sophie Turner, Brittany Mahomes and More Hits Different
- The hostage situation at Hamburg Airport ends with a man in custody and 4-year-old daughter safe
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- The Chilling Maleesa Mooney Homicide: What Happened to the Model Found Dead in Her Refrigerator
- Jason Aldean says he stands by controversial Try That in a Small Town: I know what the intentions were
- FDA proposes banning ingredient found in some citrus-flavored sodas
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Californians bet farming agave for spirits holds key to weathering drought and groundwater limits
Ranking
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Russia says it test-fired an intercontinental ballistic missile from a new nuclear submarine
- Families of Israel hostages fear the world will forget. So they’re traveling to be living reminders
- Israeli rescuers release aftermath video of Hamas attack on music festival, adding chilling details
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Maine considers electrifying proposal that would give the boot to corporate electric utilities
- Biden spent weeks of auto strike talks building ties to UAW leader that have yet to fully pay off
- Tola sets NYC Marathon course record to win men’s race; Hellen Obiri of Kenya takes women’s title
Recommendation
Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
Maine considers electrifying proposal that would give the boot to corporate electric utilities
Ukrainian war veterans with amputated limbs find freedom in the practice of jiu-jitsu
Victims of abusive Native American boarding schools to share experiences in Montana
Travis Hunter, the 2
The hostage situation at Hamburg Airport ends with a man in custody and 4-year-old daughter safe
Cardinals rookie QB Clayton Tune to start at Browns; Kyler Murray waiting game continues
FDA proposes banning ingredient found in some citrus-flavored sodas