Current:Home > NewsJudge limits Biden administration's contact with social media companies -OceanicInvest
Judge limits Biden administration's contact with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-16 23:10:24
A judge on Tuesday prohibited several federal agencies and officials of the Biden administration from working with social media companies about "protected speech," a decision called "a blow to censorship" by one of the Republican officials whose lawsuit prompted the ruling.
U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty of Louisiana granted the injunction in response to a 2022 lawsuit brought by attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri. Their lawsuit alleged that the federal government overstepped in its efforts to convince social media companies to address postings that could result in vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic or affect elections.
Doughty cited "substantial evidence" of a far-reaching censorship campaign. He wrote that the "evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian 'Ministry of Truth.'"
Republican Sen. Eric Schmitt, who was the Missouri attorney general when the lawsuit was filed, said on Twitter that the ruling was "a huge win for the First Amendment and a blow to censorship."
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry said the injunction prevents the administration "from censoring the core political speech of ordinary Americans" on social media.
"The evidence in our case is shocking and offensive with senior federal officials deciding that they could dictate what Americans can and cannot say on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other platforms about COVID-19, elections, criticism of the government, and more," Landry said in a statement.
The Justice Department is reviewing the injunction "and will evaluate its options in this case," said a White House official who was not authorized to discuss the case publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
"This administration has promoted responsible actions to protect public health, safety, and security when confronted by challenges like a deadly pandemic and foreign attacks on our elections," the official said. "Our consistent view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take account of the effects their platforms are having on the American people, but make independent choices about the information they present."
The ruling listed several government agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services and the FBI, that are prohibited by the injunction from discussions with social media companies aimed at "encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech."
The order mentions by name several officials, including Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others.
Doughty allowed several exceptions, such as informing social media companies of postings involving criminal activity and conspiracies; as well as notifying social media firms of national security threats and other threats posted on platforms.
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit also included individuals, including conservative website owner Jim Hoft. The lawsuit accused the administration of using the possibility of favorable or unfavorable regulatory action to coerce social media platforms to squelch what it considered misinformation on masks and vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic. It also touched on other topics, including claims about election integrity and news stories about material on a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, the president's son.
Administration lawyers said the government left it up to social media companies to decide what constituted misinformation and how to combat it. In one brief, they likened the lawsuit to an attempt to put a legal gag order on the federal government and "suppress the speech of federal government officials under the guise of protecting the speech rights of others."
"Plaintiffs' proposed injunction would significantly hinder the Federal Government's ability to combat foreign malign influence campaigns, prosecute crimes, protect the national security, and provide accurate information to the public on matters of grave public concern such as health care and election integrity," the administration says in a May 3 court filing.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Technology
- Lawsuit
- Social Media
- Politics
- COVID-19 Pandemic
- Pandemic
- Elections
veryGood! (9)
Related
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Florida homeless to be banned from sleeping in public spaces under DeSantis-backed law
- Aaron Taylor-Johnson Reacts to Public Criticism Over His Marriage to Sam Taylor-Johnson
- Some Georgia workers would find it harder to become union members under a new bill
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Proposed limit on Georgia film tax credit could become meaningless if studios are protected
- Head of fractured Ohio House loses some GOP allies, but may yet keep leadership role amid infighting
- Richard Simmons diagnosed with skin cancer, underwent treatment
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Execution in Georgia: Man to be put to death for 1993 murder of former girlfriend
Ranking
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Will Apple's upgrades handle your multitasking? 5 things to know about the new MacBook Air
- Texas immigration law blocked again, just hours after Supreme Court allowed state to arrest migrants
- Escaped white supremacist inmate and accomplice still at large after Idaho hospital ambush
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Minnesota penalizes county jail for depriving inmate of food and water for more than 2 days
- A teenager faces a new felony charge over the shooting at the Chiefs’ Super Bowl celebration
- 'Jeopardy' crowns winner of 2024 Tournament of Champions: What to know about Yogesh Raut
Recommendation
How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
A 'new' star will appear in the night sky in the coming months, NASA says: How to see it
M. Emmet Walsh, unforgettable character actor from ‘Blood Simple,’ ‘Blade Runner,’ dies at 88
The Daily Money: Follow today's Fed decision live
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
NFL rumors target WR Brandon Aiyuk this week. Here's 5 best fits if 49ers trade him
Shohei Ohtani’s interpreter fired by Dodgers after allegations of illegal gambling, theft
Jean Breaux, longtime Democratic state Senator from Indianapolis, dies at 65